Bell v. Krupp
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
Appellant R. Gordon Bell commenced this action in the district court to recover $110,000, representing a broker’s real estate commission allegedly due him from Vera Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach. The respondents moved before trial for a summary judgment. NRCP 56, paragraphs (b) and (c). The district judge granted the motion and dismissed Bell’s complaint with costs. Hence, this appeal. We affirm the court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Mrs. Krupp.
1. The Facts.
Sometime prior to 1966, R. Gordon Bell, a licensed real estate broker in Las Vegas,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Aldabe v. AdamsNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Wilson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Engel v. WilcoxNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Lukey v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caldwell v. Consolidated Realty & Management Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Estate of Greenberg v. SkurskiNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Di Gregorio v. MarcusNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Ferrara v. FirschingNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of Greenberg v. SkurskiNevada Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.