Legal Opinion
People v. Ratner
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1944No. Nov. 30, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 Cal.App.2d Supp. 902 (1944)
THE PEOPLE, Appellant,
v.
ABRAHAM S. RATNER, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
Nov. 30, 1944.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, Donald M. Redwine, Assistant City Attorney, and John L. Bland, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.
Stanley Moffatt for Respondent.
BISHOP, J.
This is an appeal by the People from an order dismissing a complaint which declared, first, that the defendant, [67 Cal.App.2d Supp. 903] on or about the 8th day of October, 1943, had violated section 476 of the Vehicle Code by not stopping his vehicle when he was faced by a traffic control signal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Maguire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Rauch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cook v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Municipal Court v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.