Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2008No. 45S03-0712-CR-574PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

When a trial court orders restitution either as a condition of probation or as a condition of a suspended sentence, it is required to inquire into the defendant’s ability to pay. Although the trial court did not make such an inquiry in this case, we nonetheless affirm its judgment because the defendant did not raise his inability to pay restitution as an issue on appeal.

Facts

Between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000, Jeffrey R. Pearson served as a police officer with the East Chicago Police Department. He was also a member of the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge # 59 and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shaffer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Champlain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jesus S. Gil v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Kays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Cynthia Bell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Carlin Iltzsch v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Jim A. Edsall v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API