Legal Opinion

Cynthia Bell v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2016No. 49S02-1609-CR-511PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

Indiana Code § 35-38-2-2.3(a)(6) allows a trial court to order a defendant to pay restitution to a victim as a condition of probation, but the defendant’s ability to pay must be considered before the order to pay restitution is entered. In the present case, we find that the trial court abused its discretion because the evidence before the court was insufficient to conclude defendant had the ability to pay. As such, the ordered restitution is vacated.

Facts and Procedural History

On August 4, 2014, Cynthia Bell arrived at the home of Falencia Kirkland at 4:30 a.m. and began…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Kincaid v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Justine Archer v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Shawn P. Morrell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Jerry Baker v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Marques D. Trice v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Andrew Lee Kimmons v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API