Legal Opinion

Slattery v. Larner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 30, 1929No. Patent Appeal 2149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an interference ease in which Slattery has appealed from the action of the Board of Patent Appeals on October 8, 1927, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences according priority in favor of Lamer to an invention relating to “valves, particularly hydraulic valves of the' pressure operated plunger type.”

The devices involved in the controversy appear to be contemplated as being for use in water pipes or conduits of large dimensions, some of as much as 14 feet in diameter, installed in filtering plants, irrigation plants, hydro-electric plants, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. HagemannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Neumair v. MalocsayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. In Re BijurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. In Re NicolsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. In re BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API