Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Hagemann

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1922No. 1482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceedings between John Q. Sherman and Douis F. Hagemann and three others. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority to Hagemann, the senior party, Sherman appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding in which there were prginally five parties—Hagemann, Miller, Smith, Roberts, and Sherman. The issue is expressed in one claim, which reads:

In a friction-roll manifolder employing perforated form strips, a drive roll tnda co-operative pressure roll for feeding said strips, means for relaxing the pressure between the rolls after feeding said strips a predetermined distance, s. nd form-adjusting means for engaging form perforations at the time of said pressure relaxation.

Hagemann is…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slattery v. LarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API