Legal Opinion
McLean v. Hubbard
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMichael Catalano, J.
The complaint alleges that in 1957, plaintiff instituted a “telephone answering service for businesses and individuals in the Tonawanda and North Tonawanda area” and still is so engaged; that since that time she has obtained substantial patronage and good will; that plaintiff employed defendant as manager of her business in that area, performing confidential duties, operating the switchboard, securing new customers, supervising accounts and records; that solely through such employment, defendant learned each name of plaintiff’s service; that August 1,1959, defendant left plaintiff’s employ;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- S. W. Scott & Co. v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- In Re Union Carbide Corp. Consumer Products Business Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- In Re KoelblCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Langhoff v. MarrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.