Legal Opinion

Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided March 23, 1998No. 1:94-cr-00004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

OWENS, District Judge.

In this class action lawsuit against International Dairy Queen, Inc. (“IDQ”) and American Dairy Queen Corporation (“ADQ”), the court has previously ruled that arbitration clauses in Dairy Queen subfranchise agreements should not prevent notification to the subfranchisees of their right to participaté in the class action. See Collins v. International Dairy Queen, Inc., 169 F.R.D. 690, 693 (M.D.Ga.1997). Defendants were specifically granted the right in that order to move for appropriate stays pending arbitration after notice had been sent to all potential class…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. HaganDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  2. Holden v. Deloitte and Touche LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  4. Lomax v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
  5. In Re Infocure Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API