Legal Opinion
Sek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1979No. Civ. A. 74-977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
This Title VII action was formerly assigned to the late Senior Judge Thomas J. Clary. At the close of the trial, Judge Clary entered judgment for defendant Bethlehem Steel Corporation. See 421 F.Supp. 983 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff’d mem., 565 F.2d 153 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 920, 98 S.Ct. 2268, 56 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978). Judge Clary also determined that Bethlehem Steel Corporation, as the “prevailing party” in this action, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) (1976), was entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees. See generally Christianburg Garment Co. v. EEOC, 434 U.S. 412,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Hughes v. RepkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Baughman v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James D. ARNOLD, Jr., Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION and Fickling Enterprises, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Colucci v. New York Times Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Jones v. Orange Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Lacy v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982