Colucci v. New York Times Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant, The New York Times (“Times”), was the prevailing party in plaintiff’s action which asserted against it claims of reverse sex discrimination and retaliation. The Times now moves pursuant to section 706(k) of Title VII 1 for attorneys’ fees as part of the costs of the litigation. Familiarity is assumed with this Court’s opinion dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint on the merits, 533 F.Supp. 1005. The fact that plaintiff failed to sustain his claim does not necessarily mean the defendant is automatically entitled to such fees. 2 Fees may be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Odessa CARRION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YESHIVA UNIVERSITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Lynch v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re RubenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.