Kotick, Et Ux. v. Durrant, Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a final decree permanently enjoining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ easement over their land and requiring defendants to remove all obstacles interfering with said easement.
George A. Durrant and Catherine C. Durrant, his wife, brought their bill of complaint against Julius Kotick and Carmen Kotick, his wife, Chester A. Osborn and Millicent Osborn, his wife, Adolphus Stephens and Dixie B. Stephens, his wife, and Eph Phelps, Jr., praying that defendants be enjoined from completing the fence involved in controversy, to remove so much of it as impairs plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dickinson v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- McKenney v. McKenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- United States v. Van HornDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1912
- Barber v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Genest v. L'Union St. JosephMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Lovey v. Escambia CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- American Quick Sign, Inc. v. ReinhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- AC ASSOCIATES v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.