Legal Opinion

Hilson v. Pacific & Gas Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1933No. Docket No. 8629PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict. The evidence most favorable to the plaintiff may be summarized as follows:

The plaintiff on April 7, 1930, was the owner of a building, a portion of which was occupied and used as a bakery by a tenant named Joachim. In the bakery was a bake oven operated by gas supplied by the defendant. The defendant supplied this gas to a meter at the side of the building and from the meter the gas was conveyed through pipes owned by the baker to the oven. There were four burners on the oven and in lighting…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Olson v. Whitthorne & SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Spolter v. Four-Wheel Brake Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Hagsten v. SimbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Sutcliffe v. Fort Dodge Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API