Schwartz v. Fein
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
Plaintiff sued defendant for an attorney fee and won a verdict and judgment for $2,500 plus $750 interest. Defendant appeals.
Plaintiff sued in two counts, quantum meruit and account stated. Defendant first contends the trial court should have granted his motion for directed verdict on the quantum meruit count at the close of plaintiff’s opening statement. This, on the ground the opening statement showed plaintiff intended to rely on account stated and did not state facts to support quantum meruit. We reject this contention.
The premise of defendant’s argument is that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Peppers v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Goslin v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Hutchinson v. SteinkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Miller v. Multiplex Faucet CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arie v. Intertherm, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Moore v. Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brissette v. Milner Chevrolet CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hanes v. Bacon Sales Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.