Legal Opinion

Brissette v. Milner Chevrolet Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1972No. 34348PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMEONE, Judge.

This case is one of first impression in this State. It presents unique issues in the expanding field of products liability. 1 The principal issues raised are: (1) whether the failure to produce the tire in a products liability case is essential in the proof of the plaintiff’s case; (2) whether the plaintiff-appellant may be permitted to introduce expert testimony regarding an alleged defect in an automobile tire which is claimed to have failed, causing the plaintiff’s injuries, when the plaintiff is unable to produce the allegedly defective tire for examination; and (3) whether…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Coulter v. Michelin Tire Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Kleve v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Lewis v. Envirotech Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API