Legal Opinion
Tillett v. Hodel
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1990No. CIV-89-289-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a member of the Kiowa Tribe, filed this action pro se against various federal and tribal officials, alleging violations of her constitutional rights by the Court of Indian Offenses, established by the Ana-darko Area Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs, pursuant to 25 C.F.R. Part 11. She further claims that certain officers of the Kiowa Tribe have been effectively recalled and that there has been misuse of tribal funds. Plaintiff argues that the Court of Indian Offenses is itself unconstitutional and that its order granting a Temporary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tillett v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Bowen v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Stock West Corporation, an Oregon Corporation v. Michael TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Tillett v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Davids v. CoyhisDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.