Legal Opinion

Faro v. Simplex Medical Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 1999No. Nos. 99-1288, 99-1176PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Because, contrary to the finding below, the evidence as to the only disputed fact unequivocally establishes that Simplex, Inc. received the required consideration for the issuance of the shares of stock which are now in question, see § 607.0621(3),(4), Fla. Stat. (1999), we conclude that the plaintiff appellant Faro is entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring a recognition of his ownership of 460,000 shares of the corporation, Music Tones, Ltd., into which Simplex merged. § 678.4011, Fla. Stat. (1999); Soreno Hotel Co. v. State, 107 Fla. 195, 144 So. 339 (1932); Hern v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burtman v. TECHNICAL CHEMICALS AND PROD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Soreno Hotel Co. v. State Ex Rel. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Schwadel v. UchitelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Hern v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faro v. Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. SMLX Technologies, Inc. v. FaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Southfields of Palm Beach Polo & Country Club Homeowners Ass'n v. McCulloughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API