Kilbourne v. Forester
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Presiding Judge.
The issue presented to the trial court, and now to us by this appeal, is: which of the parties is entitled to the possession of certain premises, the owners, respondents Bruce and Eleanor Forester, or appellant Joy Kilbourne who, with her son, entered under a written lease and has continued in occupancy since ? This issue, separately tried to the court upon a stipulated record, was raised by Count II of respondents’ counterclaim to appellant’s defamation action and decided favorably to respondents. This judgment was designated as final for purposes of appeal. Hence…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Millhouse v. Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Grant v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Johnson v. Simpson Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- McNeill v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Diffenderfer v. Board of President of St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Schnucks Carrollton Corp. v. Bridgeton Health & Fitness Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Cusumano v. Outdoors Today, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Howard v. Schildberg Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Brittany Sobery Family Ltd. Partnership v. Coinmach Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.