Legal Opinion

Brittany Sobery Family Ltd. Partnership v. Coinmach Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2013No. ED 97800PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LISA S. VAN AMBURG, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Coinmach Corporation (“Coinmach”) appeals from the judgment entered, after a court-tried case, in favor of The Brittany Sobery Family Limited Partnership, d/b/a Bridgeport Crossing Apartments (“Bridgeport”). Coinmach claims the trial court erred by finding: (1) Coinmach’s right of first refusal terminated during its holdover tenancy; (2) Coinmach had no contractual right to renew the leasehold for another ten years; (3) Coinmach’s holdover tenancy was a month-to-month tenancy as opposed to a year-to-year tenancy; and (4) Bridgeport was entitled to damages…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. J. E. Hathman, Inc. v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Club of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Washington University v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. v. State Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  5. West v. Sharp Bonding Agency, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Star Development Corporation v. Urgent Care Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. AB Realty One, LLC v. Miken Technologies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. American Eagle Waste Industries, LLC v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. BMJ Partners v. King's Beauty Distributor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API