Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Mitchell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1933No. CC. 469PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Pbesident:

On this certification there is presented the question of the sufficiency of a bill in chancery. The trial chancellor sustained a demurrer to the bill and certified his action to this Court for review.

The plaintiff, a licensed physician under the laws of this state, prosecutes the suit for the benefit of himself and all other physicians similarly situated. The purpose of the suit is to enjoin the defendant from practicing the profession of a physician and surgeon in this state without a license.

In the bill as amended it is alleged that the plaintiff has been a licensed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vest v. CobbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Burden v. HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Fla. Medical Ass'n v. Dept. of Prof. RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API