Legal Opinion
Dibbs v. Roldan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 14, 2005No. 03 Civ. 0913(JES)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Stephen Dibbs (“plaintiff’ or “Dibbs”) brings the above-captioned action against employees of various New York- City and New York State administrative agencies, the agencies themselves, three justices of the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, his landlord, and an architect in the employ of his landlord, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief in addition to damages and a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bodkin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Flores v. Osaka Health Spa, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Edgar M. Porter v. New York City Dept of FinanceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- Sharita T. Patterson v. The City of New York; New York Police Department; Investigator Astarita, Detective assigned to the special patrolman license division; Brooklyn Public Library; and District Council 37 UnionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025