Protect Niles v. City of Fremont
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBruiniers, J.
*1134The City of Fremont (City) approved a residential and retail development (Project) in its Niles historical district over considerable neighborhood opposition. The City adopted a mitigated negative declaration after finding the Project as mitigated would have no significant adverse environmental impact. Protect Niles1 petitioned for a writ of mandamus ordering the City to overturn the project approvals and prepare an environmental impact report. The trial court granted the petition after finding substantial evidence supported a fair argument of significant adverse impacts on *517aesthetics…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maacama Watershed Alliance v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Newtown Preservation Society v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Santa Rita Union School District v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Santa Rita Union School District v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Save Our Capitol v. Dept. of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.