Legal Opinion

Protect Niles v. City of Fremont

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 16, 2018No. A151645PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBruiniers, J.

*1134The City of Fremont (City) approved a residential and retail development (Project) in its Niles historical district over considerable neighborhood opposition. The City adopted a mitigated negative declaration after finding the Project as mitigated would have no significant adverse environmental impact. Protect Niles1 petitioned for a writ of mandamus ordering the City to overturn the project approvals and prepare an environmental impact report. The trial court granted the petition after finding substantial evidence supported a fair argument of significant adverse impacts on *517aesthetics…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. In Re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maacama Watershed Alliance v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. Newtown Preservation Society v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Santa Rita Union School District v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Santa Rita Union School District v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Save Our Capitol v. Dept. of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API