Legal Opinion
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1999No. C9-97-992PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
In 1950, the predecessor in title to a Torrens parcel of real property, now occupied by Dinkytown Wine & Spirits, reserved an appurtenant easement for ingress and egress and signage over an abutting Torrens parcel of real property. The abutting Torrens parcel is currently occupied by a McDonald’s restaurant. Certificates of title to both parcels contain a recital of the easement. Today, almost a half-century after its creation, there is no evidence that this easement has ever been utilized, and the area encompassing the easement is being used by McDonald’s as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Peters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota v. David Muniz BustosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. HessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.