Legal Opinion

People v. Myers

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1993No. S030607PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

We are asked to decide whether a jury or, if jury trial has been waived, the court may look beyond the statutory elements of a crime of which a defendant was convicted in another state and consider the record of the prior conviction to determine whether the term “enhancement” created by Penal Code section 667, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 667(a)), 1 has been established.

The Court of Appeal, believing that the question was governed by People v. Crowson (1983) 33 Cal.3d 623 [190 Cal.Rptr. 165, 660 P.2d 389], held that a section 667(a) enhancement may be based on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. CrowsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. WoodellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API