Marshall v. Stalnaker
West Virginia Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Braxton County. Action by T. Marcellus Marshall against Ahab Stalnaker and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
POEEENBARGER, JUDGE :
The sufficiency of the record on which this writ of error was allowed has been challenged on grounds, pertaining to the bill of exceptions. The order intended to malee it part of the record is skeleton in form, saying the plaintiff tendered "his bill of ex*396ceptions in the words and figures following, towit: (Here copy the same), which is signed, sealed and ordered to be made a part of the record.” The bill itself is likewise in skeleton form, certifying, among other things, “that upon the said trial evidence was given as shown in the paper marked 'Evidence’ and having the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Sabariego v. MaverickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Christy v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Gwynn v. SchwartzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- White Flame Coal Co. v. BurgessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Shipley v. Virginian Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lovett v. West Virginia Central Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.