Legal Opinion

Koppitz v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 2018No. Case Number: 115521Published

1Opinion of the Court

Larry Joplin, Judge:

¶1 Plaintiff/Appellant Harold Koppitz (Plaintiff) seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to dismiss of Defendants/Appellees Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., As Successor By Merger to Chesapeake *321Exploration, L.P. (Defendants) on Plaintiff's claims to damages for the Defendants' violation of the Oklahoma Anti-Trust Reform Act, 79 O.S. 201, et seq. (OARA), based on allegations of Defendants' "conspiracy to rig bids and depress the market for purchases of oil and natural gas leasehold interests located within the State of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Major v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. In re Capacitors Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. Micron Technology, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API