Legal Opinion
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 26, 2015No. Master File No. 14-cv-03264-JDPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1058ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 474, 475, 479, 480
JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge
Direct and indirect purchasers in these consolidated antitrust -class actions allege price-fixing conspiracies in the capacitor market. The direct purchaser plaintiffs (“DPPs”) allege that defendant manufacturers in Japan, Taiwan, Germany and the United States have participated in a single overarching conspiracy since 2003 to artificially raise prices and suppress price competition for aluminum, tantalum and film capacitors. In a separate complaint, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs (“IPPs”)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- In re Animation Workers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re German Auto. Mfrs. Antitrust Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.