Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1901No. S. F. No. 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; George H. Bahrs, Judge. Action by Mathilda Nielsen against the Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New York. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Action to recover $2,500 upon a policy of life insurance. The case was tried with a jury, and verdict rendered for plaintiff for the amount claimed. Judgment was accordingly entered, and from the judgment and order denying a new trial the defendant appeals.

On January 21, 1893, the defendant, in consideration of a premium of $43.70, issued its policy of insurance by which it promised to pay Mathilda Nielsen, wife of John Nielsen, $2,500 within sixty days after proof of the death of John Nielsen, provided such death should occur on or before the twenty-first day of January, 1894. The…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Knapp v. Homeopathic Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. Dorr v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
  5. Thorensen v. Massachusetts Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ballard v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nelson v. Mutual Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Bumpus v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API