Bumpus v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart
The question for decision on this appeal is whether the complainant, as beneficiary named in the contract of life insurance in suit, is entitled to enforce the contract as one of paid-up insurance, the value of which is $182.50, or as a contract of extended insurance, the value of which is $833.33. The facts are stipulated by the parties.
Default was made by the insured in the payment of the ninth annual premium, and he died within sixty days of the date of such default. The insured made no election or choice of any one of the nonforfeiture values of the contract, but, after his death, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wheeler v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Veal v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Mills v. National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- State Mutual Life Insurance v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Nielsen v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hancock v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Kurth v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Umstattd v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937