Thorensen v. Massachusetts Benefit Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., refusing a new trial after a verdict returned for defendant by direction of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff was a member of defendant benefit association, holding a policy by, which said association agreed to pay the sum of $2,500 to Marthena Thorensen, wife, if living, and, if not, to his legal representatives, upon his decease, providing he had complied with all of the rules and regulations of the association, had paid' usual dues, and had made bimonthly payments of certain specified assessments. If he failed to comply with all rules and regulations,, *478or failed to make any of these payments as stipulated, the policy provided that such failure
“shall be accepted and taken as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kerr v. Minnesota Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marti v. Midwest Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Rhyne v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Wolfe v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
- Nielsen v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Levan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927