Legal Opinion

Manno v. Levi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Brown, J.

On these appeals we are faced, inter alia, with the application of the doctrine, last reaffirmed by the Court of *557Appeals in Matter of Steinhardt v Johns-Manville Corp. (54 NY2d 1008, app dsmd 456 US 967), which holds that a cause of action based upon injuries sustained as the result of exposure to a deleterious substance accrues not at the time the injury becomes manifest, but, rather, when the substance is inhaled, ingested or injected. On constraint of that rule, we are compelled to conclude, despite our concern for plaintiff Carolyn Manno’s (plaintiff)…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pine v. Eli Lilly & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Prego v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Scharfman v. National Jewish Hospital & Research CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Grellet v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Swartz v. KarlanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API