Leversen v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Petitioner is counsel for defendant Walter Gibbs in a criminal trial that we have stayed pending this proceeding. He seeks a writ of mandate directing the trial court to allow him to withdraw as counsel because of a conflict of interest stemming from confidential information re ceived in the course of his firm’s representation, in other proceedings, of a witness, Richard Crisan, called by codefendant Velma Hogan.
The question presented is what standards govern disposition of a motion made during a criminal trial by defendant’s attorney to be relieved as counsel because of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. DouglasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. LaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. BoninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.