Legal Opinion

Clukey v. Town of Camden

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 21, 2013No. 12-1555PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Alan Clukey brought this procedural due process claim against his former employer, the Town of Camden (“the Town”), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the Town deprived him of a constitutionally protected property interest in his right to be recalled to employment without due process of law. The district court dismissed Clukey’s complaint, adopting the magistrate judge’s conclusion that while Clukey did have a protected property interest in his recall right, his § 1983 claim was foreclosed by the availability of a state law breach-of-contract…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Garcia-Gonzalez v. Puig-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. Rivera-Corraliza v. Puig-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Miller v. Town of WenhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. Caesars Massachusetts Management Co. v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Lawless v. SadeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API