Legal Opinion
Rivera-Corraliza v. Puig-Morales
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 22, 2015No. 13-2138UnknownCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Overview
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Ticked off that agents of the Puerto Rico Treasury Department had seized their “adult entertainment machines” (“AEMs,” to save keystrokes), today’s plaintiffs sued the supposedly responsible parties for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging (as relevant here) violations of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments as well as several commonwealth laws. The district court granted defendants summary judgment on the federal claims and dismissed the commonwealth claims without prejudice. And plaintiffs are now here asking us to. undo the court’s ruling.…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Martinez-Rivera v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Belsito Communications, Inc. v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Justiniano v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Eves v. LePageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.