Legal Opinion
Smith v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1995No. 0:93-cv-01682PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court, in the above-captioned so-called repetitive stress injury (“RSI”) case, is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Canon U.S.A., Incorporated (“Canon”) 1 on the ground that the claims of Plaintiff Judith Claveloux (“Claveloux”) are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, Canon’s motion is granted.
DISCUSSION
A motion for summary judgment may be granted only when it is shown “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Naples v. Acer America Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997