Legal Opinion

Nesselrodt v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

The State Compensation Department appeals from a judgment of the circuit court ordering it to increase its award of compensation to the plaintiff.

The facts are not in dispute. ① In December, 1958, plaintiff injured the fingers of his left hand in an industrial accident, and was entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claim was closed in July, 1959, with an award for permanent partial disability equal in value to 29.31% loss of the function of the left arm.

In January, 1965, the plaintiff in a second industrial accident again injured his left arm, including his left…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cain v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Green v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Waldorf v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Building Maintenance v. McLeesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Blair v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. City of Portland v. DuckettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Thomason v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. American Building Maintenance v. McLeesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API