Legal Opinion

Cain v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Two questions are presented on this appeal, to wit: (1) Does the judgment entered by the court conform to the special findings of fact of the jury and the law relative thereto? And (2) is the judgment as entered by the court in effect an order for the State Industrial Accident Commission to pay the claimant a lump sum?

The complaint herein alleged that on September 28, 1932, the plaintiff was involved in an accident arising out of, and in the course of, his employment, whereby he became permanently totally disabled by reason of injuries “to his back, lumbar region * * * muscles, ligaments and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Phila. Steamboat Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Klippert v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cochnower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Biglan v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stuhr v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Green v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Peitz v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Copenhefer v. PowersOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Buell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API