Legal Opinion
Boyum v. Main Entree, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 1, 1995No. C0-95-438PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants challenge the partial summary judgment entered against them, claiming that the district court erred by concluding that their negligence per se claim is time-barred by Minn.Stat. § 541.051.
FACTS
On June 27, 1992, appellant Susan Boyum sustained serious injuries when she tripped and fell on steps inside a building leased by respondent D.B. Searles (Searles), a restaurant and bar. Susan Boyum and her husband brought suit against Searles, claiming that it was negligent in failing to warn, post signs, take remedial steps, and by continuing to allow an unsafe…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Skinner v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gorton v. MashburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- 614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Knox v. Impact MHC Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025