Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 2010No. B216348PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, P. J.

In this case we hold that the new $30 to $35 court facilities fee imposed by Government Code section 70373 does not apply to cases in which the defendant’s conviction, by plea or jury verdict, was rendered before the January 1, 2009 effective date of the statute. Earlier published opinions have held that the rules against ex post facto laws and for prospective application of a new statute are not offended where the offense was committed before the effective date but the plea, verdict or sentence occurred after that date. In this brief opinion, we fill in what may be the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. United States v. GibertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1834
  4. Helena Rubenstein Internat. v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Ex parte BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. Casillas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Bishop v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2026

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API