Legal Opinion
State v. Anagnos
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 2012No. 2010AP1812PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
The petitioner, State of Wisconsin, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that affirmed the circuit court. The order of the circuit court determined that the traffic stop of Dimitrius Anagnos's vehicle was unconstitutional and that his operating privileges should not have been revoked on account of his refusal to take a chemical test to determine the presence or quantity of alcohol in his blood or breath.1
*580¶ 2. In this case, an officer conducted a traffic stop of Anagnos's vehicle. Once the vehicle was stopped and the officer spoke with Anagnos, he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BreretonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Village of Elm Grove v. Richard K. BrefkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. Brandon H. BentdahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- City of Crandon v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.