Legal Opinion

State Employees' Credit Union, Inc. v. Gentry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1985No. 841OSC1035PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note at the outset that the intervenor has failed to identify the various exceptions upon which its assignments of error are based as required by Rule 28(b)(5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this appeal on the merits.

Interstate first contends that the trial court committed reversible error in denying its motion to intervene. Specifically, Interstate contends that it had a mandatory right to intervene in the proceedings. We disagree.

Interstate argues first that G.S. § l-440.33(g)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Gary South v. Charles RoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Marcus BLACK, Plaintiff, Louis McGiboney Et Al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. CENTRAL MOTOR LINES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. Bell v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Holly Ridge Associates, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Hamilton v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Estate of Teel Ex Rel. Naddeo v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Procter v. City of Raleigh Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Easley v. Philip Morris Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API