Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Easley v. Philip Morris Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2001No. COA00-445PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Intervenor plaintiffs (intervenors) appeal the trial court’s order denying intervenors’ motion to intervene in the above-captioned case. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Plaintiff filed its complaint against defendants on 21 December 1998, seeking compensatory and injunctive relief for violations of Chapter 75 of the North Carolina General Statutes. Approximately an hour later, the trial court filed a Consent Decree and Final Judgment (Phase I) and an order dismissing with prejudice all plaintiff’s claims against defendants. Among other forms of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Wiseman v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State Employees' Credit Union, Inc. v. GentryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Procter v. City of Raleigh Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. AbernethyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Home Builders Ass'n of Fayetteville North Carolina Inc. v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Malloy v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Gates Four v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. In Re Investigation Regarding the Approval & Closing of the Business Combination of Duke Energy Corp. & Progress Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API