Legal Opinion

Sigmon v. Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 6, 1995No. 93 Civ. 7123 (PKL)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEISURE, District Judge:

This is an action brought by Jan A. Sig-mon, Esq. (“plaintiff’), against her former employer, the law firm of Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl (“defendant”). In her complaint, plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against, and ultimately terminated by, defendant because she is a woman, became pregnant, and had a child. Plaintiff alleges that defendant’s discriminatory practices violated: (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(l); (2) section 206(d)(1) of the Equal Pay Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq; (3) section 296 of the New…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Anaeme v. Diagnostek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. DumasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Smalls v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Wendi Ferguson Sellers v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API