Legal Opinion
Faances P. Syracuse v. H. Daust Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1960No. 16369_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
From the beginning, women who take their babies places away from home have carried milk and change of swaddling clothes with them, using countless varieties of containers and carriers such as hand bags, satchels, grips, valises, and like devices.
In simplest form such devices have only one compartment but there is no claim that there is anything new in providing them with more compartments. Also in the simplest form, such a device has only one opening to the single compartment, but, especially with the advent of zippers, it has been easy and customary to add more…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. Brooklyn Wood Heel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Frances P. Syracuse and New Wonder Bag Corporation v. Harry ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Alden Hansen v. Safeway Stores, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Oelbaum v. Lovable CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Metaframe Corporation v. Biozonics CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1972
- Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971