Heifetz v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
This case presents two controlling questions. Does reserved power to revoke, wholly or in part, an inter vivos trust embrace an implied power to amend ? If yes, can the trust, though expressly declared irrevocable, be terminated by the process of eliminating beneficiaries through amendments until there are left only one or more who are sui juris and who join in a notice of revocation and a demand for delivery of the property ? As applied to the facts at bar the authorities require an affirmative answer to each question.
On January 14, 1925, plaintiff, then named Florence Vidor, created a trust…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Fletcher v. Los Angeles Trust & Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Eakle v. IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Schellentrager v. Tradesmens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Bixby v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Burton v. Ulrich (In Re Schmitt)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Finlay EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Crook v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Beclar Corp. v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.