Legal Opinion
Duhame v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 2, 1954No. 516Published
1Opinion of the Court
119 F.Supp. 192 (1954)
DUHAME et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 516.
United States Court of Claims.
March 2, 1954.
David Reich, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs. William L. Murphy, Washington, D. C., was on the brief.
Thomas H. McGrail, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Warren E. Burger, for defendant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER and MADDEN, Judges.
LITTLETON, Judge.
In this suit plaintiffs seek recovery of certain sums alleged to be due them from the Government, under eight construction contracts entered into between the parties during 1941 and 1942. All contracts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duhame v. State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Michel v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Duhame v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Hargis Canneries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1945
- Felt ex rel. United States v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.