Legal Opinion
Hargis Canneries, Inc. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided February 1, 1945No. Civ. A. 435PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The complaint was filed March 31, 1944, and after the disposal of some preliminary motions the defendant filed its answer on • September 14, 1944, and on September 20, 1944, the plaintiff filed its motion for judgment on the pleadings. Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The motion for judgment on the pleadings admits all facts well pleaded, but does not admit conclusions of law; facts which the court will take judicial notice are not true; legally impossible facts; facts which would be inadmissible in evidence in the event…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Rosenhan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Brooks-Callaway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Josiah Haynesworth and Fred Hancock v. Frank P. Miller, Chief, Law Enforcement Section, Office of the Corporation Counsel, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Gregory and Appel, Inc. v. DuckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Duhame v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Continental Illinois Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.