Legal Opinion

Mace v. Jackson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

Jackson, the appellee, filed in the court below hjs amended claim, verified by affidavit, against the estate of Daniel Mace, in these words:

“ The plaintiff) Alvernas Jackson, by way of amendment to his claim, says that the estate of Daniel Mace, deceased, is indebted to him as follows: He says that on the eleventh day of May, 1867, Daniel Mace, then in life, executed and delivered to the claimant a certain written agreement, in the words and figures as follows:
“ ‘ Peter Longlois v. Antony Hedson. Partition. I have a contingent fee in this case, to be paid in land by said Longlois, in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. ShearerIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Steele v. Michigan Buggy Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Foulks v. FallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hazzard v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API