Legal Opinion
Charles L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THREE SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 6, 1998No. 97-6256PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Charles L. Carter, a black male, brought this Title VII action against his employer, Defendant-Appellee Three Springs Residential Treatment (“Three Springs”), alleging that Three Springs’ decision to promote Greg Haynes, a white male, to the position of Program Director at its Courtland, Alabama facility was motivated by unlawful racial discrimination. After the close of discovery, the district court entered summary judgment for Three Springs, finding that Carter failed to produce either direct evidence of racial discrimination, or circumstantial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Damon v. Fleming Supermarkets of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Rioux v. City of Atlanta, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Gordon Vessels v. Atlanta Independent SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.