Legal Opinion
Kernan v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 10, 1998No. 1:95-cv-00929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment. Third-party defendant Navitas Co., Ltd. (“Navitas”) has moved to dismiss the action against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the following reasons, Navitas’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
On September 20, 1995, plaintiffs commenced this action in New York State Supreme Court, Allegany County, against Kurz-Hastings, Inc. (“Kurz-Hastings”) for damages…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kernan v. Kurz-Hastings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Lipson v. BirchDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.