Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1998No. CV-95-0049 (JBW)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

This is an action by nine plaintiffs, representing the estates of persons killed by handguns, and in one case the guardian ad litem of a survivor of a shooting, against many handgun 'manufacturers and distributors. Motions to dismiss on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction were filed by a number of distributor defendants.

The magistrate judge recommended that the claims against eight defendants be dismissed and that motions to dismiss by fourteen others be denied. See Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Poliak dated August…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thomas Ex Rel. Gramling v. MallettWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. City of New York v. A-1 Jewelry & Pawn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. Simon v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  5. Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API